Boost Worldwide Inc v. Cell Station Wireless Inc

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Boost Worldwide Inc v. Cell Station Wireless Inc

Boost Worldwide Inc v. Cell Station Wireless Inc

Plaintiff:	Boost Worldwide Inc
Defendant:	Cell Station Wireless Inc
Case Number:	2:2013cv00490
Filed:	May 21, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Columbus Office
County:	FRANKLIN
Presiding Judge:	James L Graham
Presiding Judge:	Terence P Kemp
Nature of Suit:	Trademark
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 7, 2014	Filing 14 OPINION AND ORDER - the Court: (1) GRANTS the Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment (doc. 9);(2) PERMANENTLY ENJOINS the Defendant from the unauthorized use of the Boost Marks;(3) ORDERS the Defendant to:(A) remove any and all existing signage, adve rtising, and other materials bearing the Boost Marks;(B) cease and desist the use of the Boost Marks on any signage, advertising, and other materials in the future;(C) cease the sale of any Boost products; and(D) cease the sale of replenishment minut es (Re-Boost minutes) for any Boost products;(4) ORDERS the Defendant to file a written report with the Court detailing its compliance with this Order within 30 days of this Order being issued; and (5) AWARDS the Plaintiff $2,900.00 in attorneys fees and costs. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 1/7/2014. (ds)
December 4, 2013	Filing 12 OPINION AND ORDER - The Court ORDERS the Plaintiff to submit itemized billing records detailing the type of work performed, the number of hours expended, and counsels hourly rate within fourteen (14) days of this Order being issued. Once the Plaintif f submits such itemized billing records, the Court will consider its Motion for Default Judgment and determine if this is the type of exceptional case that warrants the award of attorneys fees under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §31117(a). Failure to comply with this Order will results in the denial of the Plaintiffs request for attorneys fees. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 12/4/2013. (ds)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 7, 2014

Filing 14 OPINION AND ORDER - the Court: (1) GRANTS the Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment (doc. 9);(2) PERMANENTLY ENJOINS the Defendant from the unauthorized use of the Boost Marks;(3) ORDERS the Defendant to:(A) remove any and all existing signage, adve rtising, and other materials bearing the Boost Marks;(B) cease and desist the use of the Boost Marks on any signage, advertising, and other materials in the future;(C) cease the sale of any Boost products; and(D) cease the sale of replenishment minut es (Re-Boost minutes) for any Boost products;(4) ORDERS the Defendant to file a written report with the Court detailing its compliance with this Order within 30 days of this Order being issued; and (5) AWARDS the Plaintiff $2,900.00 in attorneys fees and costs. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 1/7/2014. (ds)

December 4, 2013

Filing 12 OPINION AND ORDER - The Court ORDERS the Plaintiff to submit itemized billing records detailing the type of work performed, the number of hours expended, and counsels hourly rate within fourteen (14) days of this Order being issued. Once the Plaintif f submits such itemized billing records, the Court will consider its Motion for Default Judgment and determine if this is the type of exceptional case that warrants the award of attorneys fees under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §31117(a). Failure to comply with this Order will results in the denial of the Plaintiffs request for attorneys fees. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 12/4/2013. (ds)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boost Worldwide Inc v. Cell Station Wireless Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Cell Station Wireless Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Boost Worldwide Inc
Represented By:	Eric Jay Wittenberg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?