Brooks v. Potter et al
Gordon Brooks |
Michelle Miller, Mary Potter, Jhon Doe, T. Buchannon and State of Ohio |
2:2013cv00507 |
May 24, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
ALLEN |
Gregory L Frost |
Norah McCann King |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER ADOPTING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 28 30 in that the 22 23 Motions to Dismiss Defendants Mary Potter and Michelle Miller are GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 12/12/13. (sem1) |
Filing 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the claims against the remaining defendants be dismissed for failure to effect of process. It is further recommended that this action be dismissed. Objections due w/in fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 11/22/2013. (kk2) |
Filing 27 ORDER ADOPTING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 24 in that the Motion for an Emergency Temporary Protection Order filed by Gordon Brooks is DENIED. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 10/29/13. (sem1) |
Filing 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the Motion be DENIED. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 9/18/2013. (er1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.