Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus v. Rao et al
Plaintiff: Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus
Defendant: Aarthi S. Rao and Manickam Narayana
Case Number: 2:2013cv00526
Filed: May 31, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: FRANKLIN
Presiding Judge: Norah McCann King
Referring Judge: Algenon L Marbley
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2014 Filing 33 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed Return of Service of Subpoena Duces Tecum Acknowledgment filed by Plaintiff Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus. (Willis, Jeffrey)
August 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered pursuant to Order signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 8/12/2014. (cw)
August 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER granting #30 Motion for Default Judgment. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant Rao, in the amount of Four Hundred Sixty-Three Thousand, Two Hundred Eleven and 25/100 Dollars ($463,211.25), plus attorneys fees ($10,568.30), plus costs ($603.20), plus post-judgment interest in the amount of 3% per annum. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 8/12/2014. (cw)
May 8, 2014 Filing 30 MOTION for Default Judgment against Aarthi S. Rao by Plaintiff Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus. Responses due by 6/2/2014 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B to Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C to Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D to Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E to Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment) (Willis, Jeffrey)
April 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER. Motion for Default Judgment due by 5/9/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 4/24/2014. (pes1)
April 24, 2014 Filing 28 STATUS REPORT by Plaintiff Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus. (Willis, Jeffrey)
April 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER. Status Report due by 4/25/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 4/18/2014. (pes1)
March 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER denying as moot #23 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 3/11/14. (jr1)
March 7, 2014 Filing 25 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus (Willis, Jeffrey)
February 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER re #23 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File. Memorandum contra due by 3/7/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 2/25/2014. (pes1)
February 25, 2014 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #23 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply New date requested 3/10/2014. . Responses due by 3/7/2014 (pes1)
February 24, 2014 Filing 23 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply New date requested 3/10/2014. by Defendant Manickam Narayana. (Swisher, Zachary)
January 30, 2014 Filing 22 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Defendants Manickam Narayana, Aarthi S. Rao. (pes1)
January 29, 2014 Filing 21 MOTION for Default Judgment against Aarthi S. Rao and Manickam Narayana by Plaintiff Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus. Responses due by 2/24/2014 (Willis, Jeffrey)
November 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting #18 Plaintiff's Motion to demonstrate effective service of process on the named defendants by 2/24/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 11/26/2013. (er1) Modified on 12/2/2013 (pes1).
November 26, 2013 Filing 19 NOTICE by Plaintiff Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus re #18 MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 2/24/2014. for Service of Complaint Proposed Order (Willis, Jeffrey)
November 26, 2013 Filing 18 MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 2/24/2014. for Service of Complaint by Plaintiff Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A To Motion for Extension of Time for Service of Complaint) (Willis, Jeffrey)
November 21, 2013 Filing 17 CERTIFICATE of Clerk - regular mailing of summons and first amended complaint via the Clerks' Office. (pes1)
November 21, 2013 Filing 16 Summons Issued as to Manickam Narayana, Aarthi S. Rao. (pes1)
November 12, 2013 Filing 15 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Manickam Narayana, Aarthi S. Rao. (pes1)
October 30, 2013 Filing 14 NOTICE by Plaintiff Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus Return of Subpoena - Served (Willis, Jeffrey)
October 4, 2013 Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by Clerk: A copy of the complaint and issued summons was sent to the named defendants via certified mail. (er1)
July 31, 2013 Filing 12 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Manickam Narayana. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (rew1)
July 31, 2013 Filing 11 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Aarthi S. Rao. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (rew1)
July 18, 2013 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of mailing by Clerk A copy of the summons and complaint was mailed by regular mail to defendants Manickam Narayana and Aarthi S. Rao. (rew)
July 17, 2013 Filing 9 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus as to Aarthi S. Rao. (Willis, Jeffrey)
July 17, 2013 Filing 8 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus as to Manickam Narayana. (Willis, Jeffrey)
July 3, 2013 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of mailing by Clerk : A copy of the summons and complaint was mailed by certified mail to Aarthi S. Rao # 7009 1410 0001 6850 2750 and Manickam Narayana # 7009 1410 0001 6850 2767 from Clerk's office. (rew)
June 6, 2013 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Manickam Narayana, Aarthi S. Rao. (pes1)
June 5, 2013 Filing 5 NOTICE by Plaintiff Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus re #3 Amended Complaint Summons to be Issued by Clerk (Willis, Jeffrey)
June 5, 2013 Filing 4 NOTICE by Plaintiff Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus re #3 Amended Complaint Summons to be Issued by Clerk (Willis, Jeffrey)
June 5, 2013 Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus. (Willis, Jeffrey)
May 31, 2013 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Manickam Narayana, Aarthi S. Rao. (pes1)
May 31, 2013 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-4125296), filed by Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form Narayana, #2 Summons Form Rao, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Willis, Jeffrey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus v. Rao et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of Columbus
Represented By: Jeffrey A Willis
Represented By: Anjali Chavan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aarthi S. Rao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Manickam Narayana
Represented By: Zachary Swisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?