Novel, et al., v. State of New York et al
| Sur G Novel, Anna Craig, Jerimy Mulligan and Abby Novel |
| State of New York, Committee on Professional Standards, Jevon L. Garrett and Peter M. Torncello |
| 2:2013cv00698 |
| July 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Mark R. Abel |
| James L Graham |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
OPINION AND ORDER denying 26 Motion. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 10/29/2015. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
24
OPINION AND ORDER granting 21 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 11/12/2014. (ds)
|
|
Filing
11
OPINION and ORDER - The Court grants plaintiff an additional tendays beyond the previously established deadline to respond to the show cause order. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 8/21/13. (ds)
|
|
Filing
5
OPINION AND ORDER denying 3 motion for temporary restraining order. Plaintiff is further ORDERED to show cause why this case is not subject to dismissal on sovereign immunity grounds. Within 20 days of receipt of this order, plaintiff shall file a show-cause memorandum not exceeding 20 pages. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 7/17/13. (ds)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
