Childers v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
| Thomas Childers |
| Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution |
| 2:2013cv00991 |
| October 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FAIRFIELD |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
OPINION AND ORDER adopting and affirming the Magistrate Judge's 09/10/15 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation are denied. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied and this action is dismissed. Petitioner's request for a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 11/04/2015. (dh1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
19
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Thomas Childers. The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the petition for a writ ofhabeas corpus be DENIED and that this action be DISMISSED. Objections to R&R due by 9/28/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 9/10/2015. (pes)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
14
OPINION AND ORDER overruling 13 the Petitioner's Objection to 11 the Magistrate Judge's 06/26/14 Report and Recommendation and adopting and affirming the Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's request for a stay is denied. Petit ioner's request to delete this claim and proceed on his remaining exhausted claims is granted. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 9 is accordingly denied as moot to the extent that Petitioner's unexhausted claim of ineffective assistanc e of appellate counsel is now deleted from the Petition. Respondent is directed to file an answer to the Petition that complies with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section § 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts within 21 days. Petitioner may file a response within 21 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 08/04/2014. (dh1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Childers v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Thomas Childers | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
| Represented By: | Hilda Rosenberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
