Richard et al v. Mohr et al
| Donald Richard, Dennis Calo and Ronald Jolly |
| Gary C. Mohr, Cynthia B. Mausser, Kathleen Kovach, Ellen Venters, R. F. Rauschenberg, Taryce Thalheimer, Richard Cholar, Marc Houk, Andre Imbrogno, Ron Nelson, Jr., Michael H. Jackson and Alicia Handwerk |
| 2:2013cv01013 |
| October 10, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| James L Graham |
| Norah McCann King |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 22 MOTION for Relief from Judgment: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Plaintiffs' Motion be denied. Objections to R&R due by 7/24/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 7/10/2019. (er)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER - The Court overrules plaintiffs' objections Doc. 9 , and adopts Report and Recommendation re 3 Report and Recommendations. This action is hereby dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 3/5/14. (ds)
|
|
Filing
3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint. It is RECOMMENDED that the action be DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Objections to R&R due by 2/10/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 1/23/2014. (pes1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
