United States of America v. Real Property 10338 Marcy Road Northwest, Canal Winchester, Ohio
| United States of America |
| Real Property 10338 Marcy Road Northwest, Canal Winchester, Ohio |
| Levi H Winston and Robin Adams |
| 2:2013cv01048 |
| October 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Mark R. Abel |
| George C Smith |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
OPINION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE in that the United States has met its burden by showing it is more likely than not that the Defendant Real Property at Marcy Road was purchased with proceeds from illegal drug trafficking activity. Defendant Real Property is therefore forfeitable to the United States as proceeds of illegal drug trafficking under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6). Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 3/30/18. (sem)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 5/27/15. (lvw)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER denying 28 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 02/02/2015. (sr1)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER cancelling the 2/6/14 PPTC and the parties are DIRECTED to submit proposed scheduling orders within 14 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 2/3/14. (sem1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
