Lister v. Pickaway County Sheriff's Office et al
| Travin Michael Lister |
| Pickaway County Sheriff's Office, Ronald James Reynolds, David Cody Griffen, Cody E. Moore, Brian L. Arnold, Cole D. Hopkins, Rachael A. Smith, Lt. Troy Rine, Robert B. Radcliff, James S. Dean and Judy C. Wolford |
| 2:2014cv00269 |
| March 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| ROSS |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Michael H. Watson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER adopting 34 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 2/17/15. (jk1) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER adopting 5 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 9/11/14. (jk1)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 4 Complaint: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Pickaway County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Robert Radcliff, James Dean and Judy C. Wolford be DISMISSED for fai lure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Report. Plaintiff's 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 4/2/2014. (er1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
