Brewster v. Aramark Correctional Services
| Gary A. Brewster |
| Aramark Correctional Services |
| Karl C. Wetherby, Joseph Rickard and Jonathan E. Kiste |
| 2:2014cv00273 |
| March 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| NOBLE |
| Norah McCann King |
| Algenon L. Marbley |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED. Because this Court no longer has subject matter jurisdiction over this case, the case is hereby REMAND ED to the Noble County Court of Common Pleas. Motions in ECF 5 , 9 , 10 , 14 , 15 , and 68 are hereby DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 3/2/2015. (pes1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER adopting 61 Report and Recommendations.; denying 20 Motion to Certify Class. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 10/3/2014. (cw)
|
|
Filing
69
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is RECOMMENDED that Aramark's First Motion forJudgment on the Pleadings, ECF 29 , be GRANTED. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the remaining pending motions, ECF 5 , 9 , 10 , 14 , 15 , 68 be DENIED as moot. Objections to R&R due by 10/20/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 10/2/2014. (pes1)
|
|
Filing
61
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 20 MOTION to Certify Class filed by Gary A. Brewster. It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Motion for Determination as Class Action Under Fed. Rule 23(c)(1), ECF 20 , be DENIED without prejudice to renewal should counsel enter an appearance on behalf of plaintiff. Objections to R&R due by 8/25/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 8/6/2014. (pes1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
