Marshall v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Kenneth Marshall
Defendant: Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections, Gary Mohr, John R. Kasich and Brian Cook
Case Number: 2:2014cv00338
Filed: April 11, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: PICKAWAY
Presiding Judge: Gregory L Frost
Presiding Judge: Terence P Kemp
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 150 OPINION and ORDER adopting and affirming 148 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 5/19/17. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
April 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 148 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 145 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings be granted in part and denied in part, and that 145 MOTION for Summary Judgment be granted. Objections to R&R due by 4/24/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 4/10/2017. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
May 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 116 ORDER adopting 113 the Report and Recommendation; granting 94 Defendant Governor John R. Kasich's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 5/24/16. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
April 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 113 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and ORDER - It is RECOMMENDED that 94 MOTION to Dismiss be GRANTED. Further, the following discovery motions are DENIED 91 MOTION /Petition for the Court Exercise Equitable or Relief in Equity, 98 MOTION for Leave of Court to take the Depositions of the State Government Agents, 105 MOTION, 106 MOTION to Compel, and 112 MOTION to Compel. Any objections to R&R and/or ORDER due by 5/16/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 4/27/2016. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
January 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER denying as moot 74 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Motion for TRO; denying as moot 76 Motion for an extension of time; denying 79 Motion for Discovery; denying as moot 81 Motion for court order ; granting 83 Motion to suppl ement ; granting 85 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying as moot 86 Motion ; denying as moot 87 Motion for court order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 1/11/2016. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
October 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER denying 29 Motion for More Definite Statement; denying 37 Motion to Supplement ; denying 40 Motion to Supplement ; denying 42 Motion for Injunctive Relief ; denying 43 Motion to Clairfy; denying 59 Motion to Clarify ; denyi ng as moot 61 Motion for Status of Proceedings or Hearing for Scheduling Proceedings ; denying 62 Motion for Injunctive Relief ; denying 66 Motion for Appropriate Remedies with Respect to Prison Conditions ; denying 68 Motion for Judicial Notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 10/9/2015. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER denying as moot 16 Motion to Strike ; Motions for Relief from Judgment(Docs 18 and 20 ) as well as 21 Motion for Injunctive Relief and 22 Motion to Supplement are granted to the extent that the Court will give plaintiff additional time to make service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 3/10/2015. (agm1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marshall v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Mohr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John R. Kasich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Cook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?