Mason v. Wal-Mart Corporation et al
Guy Mason |
Wal-Mart Corporation, Kmart Holding Corporation, Family Dollar Stores of Ohio, Inc., Lowe's Companies, Inc., Big Lots Stores, Inc., Dollar General Stores, Inc., Mason Boyce, The City of Steubenville, Ohio, J Sloane, Officer Holzworth, Officer Palmer, Deputy Sterling and Fred J Abdella |
2:2014cv00446 |
May 14, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
JEFFERSON |
Terence P Kemp |
Algenon L. Marbley |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 ORDER granting 70 Motion for Summary Judgment. This case is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment for Wal-Mart. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 5/9/2016. (cw) |
Filing 69 ORDER denying 64 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 8/27/2015. (agm) |
Filing 57 ORDER finding as moot 27 Motion to Dismiss; granting 12 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 3/16/2015. (cw1) |
Filing 56 OPINION AND ORDER - 47 Motion for Order to Show Cause is denied and the supoena directed to Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney Jane Hanlin, dated August 15, 2014, is quashed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 1/29/2015. (agm1) |
Filing 53 CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 12/18/2014. (agm1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.