Howard v. Ohio State Supreme Court et al
| Gregory T Howard |
| David W. Fais, Heidi N. Eischen, Margaret M. Sturgeon, Thomas A. Dixon, Patrick Sheeran, Kimberly Cocroft, Spartan Stores Associate, LLC, Ohio Bureau of Worker's Compensation, Industrial Commission of Ohio, Mary Ellen O'Shaughnessy, Ohio State Supreme Court, Gary Tyack, Amy O'Grady, John A. Connor, Julia L Dorrian, Betsy Schuster and Lisa L Sadler |
| 2:2014cv00743 |
| July 7, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| LUCAS |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Michael H. Watson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
OPINION and ORDER adopting 5 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 10/27/14. (jk1)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER striking 12 Plaintiff's Second Supplemental Objection to Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to cease filing motions and Objections until the Court has reached a decision on whether to adopt the Report and Recommendation or to sustain his Objections. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 8/1/2014. (er1)
|
|
Filing
5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 4 Complaint: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the Court dismiss this action. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 7/23/2014. (er1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
