Ward et al v. Rawlake et al
John H. Ward, Billy Joe Sage, Jr. and WF Farm LLC |
Todd Rawlake and Jim S Hall |
2:2014cv00848 |
July 15, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
UNION |
Terence P Kemp |
Michael H. Watson |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 83 ORDER denying without prejudice 78 Motion to File Document Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 5/15/2017. (ew) |
Filing 58 ORDER ADOPTING the 41 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 21 Plaintiff shall deposit the total Disputed Sum $76,520 with the Court, be discharged of all liability relating to the deposited funds, and be discharged from this action. Defendants are enjoined from prosecuting any other proceeding related to the deposited funds. Plaintiffs' request for attorneys fees is DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 8/10/15. (sem) |
Filing 41 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 21 MOTION for Order to Deposit Funds. It is RECOMMENDED that plaintiffs be permitted to deposit $76,520 with the Court, be discharged of all liability relating to the deposited funds, and be discharged from th is action. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that defendants be enjoined from prosecuting any other proceeding related to the deposited funds. It is RECOMMENDED that plaintiffs' request for attorneys fees be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 4/6/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 3/20/2015. (pes1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.