Harper v. Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
Petitioner: Henry N. Harper
Respondent: Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
Case Number: 2:2014cv01220
Filed: August 13, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: GUERNSEY
Presiding Judge: Gregory L Frost
Presiding Judge: Terence P Kemp
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER granting 42 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; granting 44 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Gregory L. Frost on 9/9/15. (kn)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
July 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER adopting 36 Report and Recommendations.; denying 14 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Gregory L. Frost on 7/27/15. (kn)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
June 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 36 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that 14 Motion forSummary Judgment be DENIED, and that this action be DISMISSED. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 6/23/2015. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
January 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER denying 26 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; denying 27 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Gregory L. Frost on 1/29/15. (kn)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER denying 8 Motion ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 13 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge Gregory L. Frost on 12/18/14. (kn)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 8 MOTION Release of a Prisoner in a Habeas Corpus Proceeding filed by Henry N. Harper. The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Petitioner's Motion for Bond be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 12/15/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 11/26/2014. (pes1)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular and certified mail (7009 2820 0003 5796 2945) to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harper v. Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Henry N. Harper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?