Thomas et al v. Nationwide Children's Hospital, Inc. et al
| Daniel Thomas and Anna Thomas |
| Nationwide Children's Hospital, Inc., The Center For Family Safety & Healing, The Center For Child & Family Advocacy at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Farah Wadia Brink, M.D., Jon Thackeray, M.D., The City of Columbus, Ohio, Board of Trustees, Franklin County Children Services and Mallory Figgins |
| 2:2014cv01236 |
| August 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Mark R. Abel |
| Peter C. Economus |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
194
ORDER granting 182 Motion to Seal. Defendant shall, within 14 days of the entry of this Order, file under seal a redacted version of Plaintiff's brief 181 for the Court's consideration. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 3/27/2018. (mas)
|
|
Filing
187
OPINION AND ORDER granting 155 the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Nationwide Children's Hospital, the Center for Family Safety and Healing, the Center for Child and Family Advocacy, Dr. Farah Wadia Brink, Dr. Jonathan Thackeray, and Dr. Corey Roods; and granting 156 the Motion for Summary Judgment of Franklin County Children Services. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 05/19/2017. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
173
ORDER granting 172 Motion to File Document Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 3/27/2017. (agm)
|
|
Filing
168
OPINION AND ORDER overruling 160 Defendants' Motion to Reconsider the Magistrate Judge's Opinion and Order and affirming 134 the Magistrate Judge's Order: the Motion to Compel 120 is granted, and the Motion to Strike 121 is de nied. The Motion to Vacate Deadlines 111 is granted as outlined in the Opinion and Order. Plaintiff's Motion to Suspend Deadline to Respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(d) 166 is granted. Plaintiffs will file their Response to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment not later than 03/27/17. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 02/10/2017. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
162
ORDER granting 161 Motion to File Document Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 2/1/2017. (agm)
|
|
Filing
157
ORDER granting 154 Motion to File Document Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 1/30/2017. (agm)
|
|
Filing
134
OPINION AND ORDER granting 120 MOTION to Compel; denying 121 MOTION to Strike; granting 111 MOTION to Vacate as outlined. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 1/19/2017. (agm) Modified text on 1/19/2017 (agm).
|
|
Filing
125
AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 12/16/2016. (agm)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER denying 112 Motion to File Document Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 12/2/2016. (agm)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER granting 78 Motion to File Document Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 3/21/2016. (agm)
|
|
Filing
76
OPINION AND ORDER denying 50 MOTION to Compel the Burley Plaintiffs to Produce Executed Authorizations for Release of Child Abuse and Neglect Investigation Files. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 3/7/2016. (agm)
|
|
Filing
73
OPINION AND ORDER granting 63 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 12/4/2015. (agm)
|
|
Filing
46
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 4/13/2015. (agm1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
