Stokes v. Ells et al
Ronald C. Stokes |
Steve Ells and Jack Loudermilk |
2:2014cv01601 |
September 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
LICKING |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
George C Smith |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 74 OPINION AND ORDER granting 59 First MOTION for Summary Judgment; DENYING as moot 61 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ronald C. Stokes. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 3/23/2017. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified text on 3/23/2017 (agm). |
Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 5/27/15. (lvw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 18 ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10 MOTION to Dismiss. The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Defendants Ells and Loudermilk be DISMISSED from this action. Plaintiff's 16 Motion for Leave to Amend is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PAR T. Plaintiff must file his Amended Complaint within THIRTY (30) DAYS of the date of this Order. Objections to R&R due by 5/26/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 5/8/2015. (mas)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.