Bowker v. Kollus et al
| Erik S. Bowker |
| Ohio State Police Department, Mailroom Employees #1, #2, and #3, Lisa Huston, John Stocker, Tim Hoffbacher, Nurse Steve, Massillon State Hospital, Unknown Doctor #2, Kollus, Nursing Staff, Steven Pessefall, Ohio Department of Mental Health and Three Unknown Employees |
| 2:2014cv02162 |
| October 31, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| STARK |
| Mark R. Abel |
| James L Graham |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER denying 4 Motion ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 5 Report and Recommendations. This case is hereby dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 12/17/2014. (ds)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
5
INITIAL SCREENING/REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Erik S. Bowker. Plaintiff's motion to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs is GRANTED. The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the complaint be DISMISSED because it fa ils to give defendants fair notice of the claims against them under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Defendants do not have to respond to the complaint unless the Court rejects this Report and Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 11/12/2014. (sr1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
