In Re: Lloyd B Maynard
| Lloyd B Maynard |
| 2:2014cv02649 |
| December 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Algenon L. Marbley |
| Withdrawal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
2
ORDER granting 1 Motion to Withdraw Reference of the case styled In re Lloyd B. Maynard now pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Case No. 14-55375. The Court withdraws the reference for the limited purpose of handling the discovery dispute between attorney for Debtor and the United States Trustee concerning the Trustees motion to review attorneys fees in the bankruptcy matter. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 4/13/2016. (cw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In Re: Lloyd B Maynard | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lloyd B Maynard | |
| Represented By: | Michael William Warren |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
