Rogers v. Reed et al
Plaintiff: Alterik Rogers
Defendant: Manard Reed, Reese Thompson, Jefferson County Sheriff's Department and Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney
Case Number: 2:2014cv02750
Filed: December 29, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: BELMONT
Presiding Judge: Terence P Kemp
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Watson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 63 OPINION and ORDER adopting 61 the Report and Recommendation; denying 57 Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 11/9/18. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
October 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 57 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Reese Thompson, Manard Reed. It is RECOMMENDED that the Court DENY Defendants' Motion ECF No. 57 . In addition, in light of the resolution of State v. Rogers, Jefferson County Case No. 14CR012, ECF No. 53 is VACATED. Objections to R&R due by 10/26/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 10/12/2018. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
July 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER ADOPTING 50 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, granting in part and denying in part 42 , 47 Motions for Summary Judgment. The malicious prosecution claim is STAYED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 7/13/2017. (ew)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
June 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 50 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER - The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that 42 MOTION for Summary Judgment be GRANTED with respect to the claims against Sgt. Reed in his official capacity and DENIED in all other respects. Mr. Rogers' motion to proceed to trial (Doc. 38 ), Defendants' motion to compel (Doc. 39 ), and Mr. Rogers' motion to disclose (Doc. 40 ) are DENIED AS MOOT. Objections to R&R due by 7/5/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 6/21/2017. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 32 OPINION and ORDER adopting 30 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 11/13/15. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
October 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER - The Magistrate Judge recommends that 14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM be denied in part and granted in part. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days. Further, Plaintiff's Motions 17 MOTION for Discovery for the Production of Grand Jury Transcripts, 18 MOTION for Discovery for the Production of Video Surveillance Tapes, 20 MOTION for Discovery, 23 MOTION to Produce, and 29 MOTION to Appoint Counsel are de nied. Finally, Defentants' 22 MOTION to Strike and to Stay is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's 24 MOTION for Discovery is stricken. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 10/20/2015. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rogers v. Reed et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alterik Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Manard Reed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reese Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jefferson County Sheriff's Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?