Crochran et al v. Columbus City Schools et al
Naqis Crochran and Amatullah Shields |
Columbus City Schools, Columbus Board of Education, Andrew Smith, Courtney N Plummer, Ms. Brooks, Mary Nicole Ramming and Laura Shearer |
2:2015cv00632 |
February 18, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
FRANKLIN |
Terence P Kemp |
Edmund A Sargus |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 107 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 77 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 94 Defendants' Motion to Strike; denying as moot 93 Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike; denying as moot 90 Defendants& #039; Motion in Limine; and denying as moot 92 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine. Plaintiffs' remaining state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in this action. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 10/04/2017. (dh1) |
Filing 56 OPINION AND ORDER re 33 Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of 31 the Magistrate Judge's Opinion and Order denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel. The Court overrules Plaintiff's objections. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 10/14/16. (dh1) |
Filing 31 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 14 MOTION to Compel Discovery/MOTION for Sanctions; denying 15 MOTION to Quash; denying 18 MOTION to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 4/27/2016. (agm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.