Robison v. Coey et al
| David A. Robison |
| Woody Coey, Cody Posey, Brent Cruse, Corby Free, Roger Wilson and Gary Mohr |
| 2:2015cv00944 |
| March 16, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| ROSS |
| James L Graham |
| Terence P Kemp |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER granting 77 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 79 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 4/17/2017. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Filing
78
ORDER granting 61 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 76 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 3/2/2017. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Filing
76
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER - It is recommended that 61 MOTION for Summary Judgment be granted as to the initial retaliation claim only. Objections to R&R due by 2/16/2017. Further, Mr. Robisons discovery motions (Docs. 62 , 64 , and [ 71]) are denied. If defendants wish to address the remaining claim by way of a summary judgment motion, they shall do so by 3/1/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 2/2/2017. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Filing
75
ORDER denying 40 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; adopting Report and Recommendations re 70 Report and Recommendations.; denying 26 Motion for TRO; denying as moot 28 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, and denies plaintiff's objection [#72] to the discovery order [#53]. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 10/21/2016. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Filing
70
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER - It is RECOMMENDED that 26 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction be DENIED, that 28 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM be DENIED AS MOOT, and that 40 MOT ION for Judgment on the Pleadings be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 9/26/2016. Further, 41 MOTION for Sanctions is DENIED; 50 MOTION to Compel is DENIED; 45 MOTION to Compel is GRANTED as outlined in this Order; 53 MOTION to Co mpel is DENIED; 55 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery is GRANTED (Discovery due by 9/30/2016.); and 57 MOTION for Supplemental Discovery is STRICKEN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 9/9/2016. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Filing
37
ORDER STRIKING 27 MOTION for Discovery; DENYING 21 MOTION to Compel; GRANTING 23 MOTION for Leave to File, 25 MOTION for Leave to File, and 33 MOTION to Compel. Defendants shall make a further response to the document requests which are the subject of Doc 33 within thirty days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 6/16/2016. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Filing
13
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; adopting Report and Recommendations re 10 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 10/21/2015. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Filing
10
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM be granted in part and denied in part. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 9/14/2015. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.