Kelley v. Shoemaker et al
Michael A. Kelley, Jr. |
Frederick Shoemaker, Pamela Erdy, Bevelery Pfelffar and Denise R. Matthews |
2:2015cv02233 |
May 27, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
FRANKLIN |
Terence P. Kemp |
Algenon L. Marbley |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER UPHOLDING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DISMISSING Plaintiffs case in its entirety as to the four originally-joined Defendants. The Court also sua sponte DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiffs case against Ohio Medicaid for lack of subject mat ter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendants. This case is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 5/12/2016. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 2 Complaint be dismissed in its entirety - Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days. The court determines Plaintiff qualifies financially for a waiver of the filing fee, and 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 6/23/2015. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.