Davis v. Mohr et al
| Carlton Davis |
| Gary Mohr, Eddy, Hale, Missy Rousch, Heather Hagan and Members of the "Collegial Review Board |
| 2:2015cv02739 |
| August 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Terence P. Kemp |
| Edmund A. Sargus |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 33 MOTION for Summary Judgment: It is RECOMMENDED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED. Objections to R&R due by 8/16/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 8/2/2017. (kdp)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER denying as moot 29 Motion for Discovery; denying 30 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 1/27/2017. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER ADOPTING 23 Report and Recommendation; Plaintiff's Motions to supplement [16,17] are granted; Plaintiff's Motions for preliminary injunction [9,14] are denied; and Defendant's Motions to dismiss [11,15] are denied. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 7/7/16. (aq)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
23
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - the Court recommends that the two motions for preliminary injunction (Docs. 9 and 14) be denied (although the Court should grant Mr. Davis' two motions, Docs. 16 and 17, to supplement those motions), and that Defenda nts' motions to dismiss (Docs. 11 and 15) be denied. Objections to R&R due by 4/1/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 3/15/2016. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
