Larkin v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
| Virginia Larkin |
| FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and PRS Express, Inc |
| 2:2015cv02745 |
| August 21, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| STARK |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Michael H Watson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER TO TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Eastern Division. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 8/27/2015. (mas)
|
| Case transferred to District of Northern District of Ohio Eastern Division. Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (mas) |
| Case transferred from Ohio Southern has been opened in Northern District of Ohio as case 5:15-cv-01730, filed 08/27/2015. (sem) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Plaintiff Virginia Larkin of Intent to File (Draher, Shannon) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., PRS Express, Inc. (mas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-5177656), filed by Virginia Larkin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., #3 Summons Form PRS Express, Inc.) (Draher, Shannon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
