Oster v. Huntington Bancshares Incorporated et al
| Jody M. Oster |
| Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, The Huntington National Bank, F. Thomas Eck, IV and Richard Cheap |
| 2:2015cv02746 |
| August 21, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Gregory L. Frost |
| Terence P. Kemp |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
153
OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 120 Motion in Limine; denying 121 Defendants' Motion to Bifurcate; granting 122 Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Certain Witnesses; granting in part and denying in part 123 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 7/28/17. (sem)
|
|
Filing
109
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 58 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 81 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 5/19/2017. (cw)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER denying 71 Motion to File Document Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 1/5/2017. (agm)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER granting 67 Motion to File Document Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 12/27/2016. (agm)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER denying 60 Motion to File Document Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 12/20/2016. (agm) Modified on 12/20/2016 (agm).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
