Rodgers v. Solano County Courts et al
Otis Lee Rodgers |
Solano County Courts, Jackson K. Harris, Sara Andrew and Eric Griffith |
2:2015cv02754 |
August 26, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
FRANKLIN |
Gregory L. Frost |
Norah McCann King |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re, 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Otis Lee Rodgers. Signed by Judge Gregory L. Frost on 11/16/15. (kn)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, with prejudice, for want of prosecution. Objections to R&R due by 11/12/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 10/26/2015. (pes)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 11 ORDER adopting 8 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge Gregory L. Frost on 9/22/15. (kn)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 5 Motion for TRO filed by Otis Lee Rodgers. It is RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim for relief and that plaintiff' s motions for interim injunctive relief, Motion, ECF 1; Motion, ECF 5, be DENIED. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that, should plaintiff decide to pursue in this action a claim for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.§ 2241 o r 28 U.S.C. § 2254, he be required to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Objections to R&R due by 9/14/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 8/26/2015. (pes)(This document and 2254 form have been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.