Timber View Properties, Inc v. M&T Property Investments LTD
| Timber View Properties, Inc |
| M&T Property Investments LTD |
| David A Skrobot |
| 2:2015cv02855 |
| September 24, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| HOCKING |
| Terence P. Kemp |
| George C. Smith |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
OPINION AND ORDER overruling 41 Objection to Report and Recommendation; adopting 38 Report and Recommendations; granting 12 Motion to Intervene; granting 15 Motion for Leave to Appear as Counsel for Receiver; denying 16 Motion for Extension of Time; denying 34 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 8/25/2016. (kk)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification)
|
|
Filing
38
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 12 MOTION to Intervene be GRANTED. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that 34 MOTION to Stay Recommitment Determination and Request for Hearing be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 7/5/2016. Per GCS Chambers, 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 12 MOTION to Intervene is terminated as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 6/17/2016. (agm)
|
|
Filing
26
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 12 MOTION to Intervene be granted. Objections due within fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 1/29/2016. (agm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
