Heeter v. J. Peterman Enterprises, LLC et al
| Brian Heeter |
| J. Peterman Enterprises, LLC, Carlton Banks Enterprises, LLC, Robert Shotwell and Michael Shotwell |
| 2:2015cv03062 |
| December 8, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| WASHINGTON |
| Terence P. Kemp |
| Edmund A. Sargus |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
OPINION AND ORDER granting 50 Plaintiff Alan Mayle's Motion for Default Judgment and granting in part and denying in part 42 Plaintiff Brian Heeter's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Plaintiff Heeter's Motion is granted in par t as to Defendants Robert Shotwell and J. Peterman Enterprises LLC, but denied in part as to Defendants Michael Shotwell and Carlton Banks Enterprises, LLC. The Court will consider evidence of the amount of damages, lost profits, attorneys' fee s, and the nature and extent of injunctive relief requested by both Plaintiffs at a combined hearing to be scheduled forthwith by separate order. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 09/21/2017. (dh1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER denying 43 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 10/26/2016. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
