McGlone v. Ross Correctional Institution et al
Jerry L McGlone, II |
Ross Correctional Institution, Dr. Tedrich and Lt. Corell |
2:2016cv00054 |
January 20, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Terence P. Kemp |
Edmund A. Sargus |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 OPINION AND ORDER adopting the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to timely effect service of process. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 12/04/2017. (dh1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 1 Complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to timely effect service of process. Objections to R&R due by 8/25/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 8/11/2017. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 12 OPINION AND ORDER denying 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 05/20/16. (dh1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.