Brown v. United States Government et al
| Wayne Lee Brown |
| United States Government, Internal Revenue Service, District Court and Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals |
| 2:2016cv00358 |
| April 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Algenon L. Marbley |
| Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER denying 27 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 3/5/2018. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying as moot 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; OVERRULING 17 Objection to Magistrate Judge Order; striking 22 Plaintiffs Request for Admission. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 6/1/2017. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER denying 20 Motion for Recusal.. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley and Magistrate Judge Preston Deavers on 5/23/2017. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
