Shanklin v. Mohr et al
| George A. Shanklin |
| Gary C. Mohr, Melissa Adams and Rhonda Richard |
| 2:2016cv00480 |
| May 31, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| MADISON |
| Kimberly A. Jolson |
| Edmund A. Sargus |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER adopting the Magistrate Judge's 07/26/16 Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel 2 and for emergency injunctive relief 3 are denied and plaintiff's complaint [4[ is dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this Order (dh1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is GRANTED (Doc. 1 ); it is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 4 ) be DISMISSED and his Motion for Emergency Injunction (Doc. 3 ) be DENIED; and his Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 2 ) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 7/26/2016. (pes)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
