Woodard v. Winters et al
| Keimarkus O. Woodard |
| Mr. Winters, J. Evans, Hunter Sexton, John Doe and J. Elkins |
| 2:2016cv00704 |
| July 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| ROSS |
| Terence P. Kemp |
| Algenon L. Marbley |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
ORDER denying 70 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 80 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 102 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiffs claim for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs is DISMISSED pursuant to § 1915(e). Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claim premised upon Defendants alleged failure to permit him to decontaminate promptly following the use of OC spray is permitted to proceed. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 9/26/2018. (cw)
|
|
Filing
102
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 70 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Keimarkus O. Woodard, 80 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Hunter Sexton, J. Elkins, J. Evans, Mr. Winters. It is RECOMMENDED that Defendants Motion be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and that Plaintiffs Motion be DENIED. The Court has also screened the claims upon which Defendants have not moved for summary judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), and further RECOMMEND S that Plaintiffs claim for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs be DISMISSED pursuant to § 1915(e) and that his excessive force claim premised upon Defendants alleged failure to permit him to decontaminate following admin istration of oleoresin capsicum spray ("OC spray") be permitted to proceed. Objections to R&R due by 7/2/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 6/18/2018. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER denying 32 Motion for Discovery, 33 Motion to Request a Subpoena for Discovery, 34 Motion for Entry of Default, 48 Motion to Compel Discovery, and 56 Motion to Compel Discovery; granting 59 Motion for Extension o f Time. The new dispositive motions deadline is 10/5/2017. The Court EXTENDS the discovery period for thirty days, until 10/5/2017. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (ECF No. 30-1), and Defen dant Elkins is ORDERED to file his Answer to the Amended Complaint WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 9/5/2017. (kdp)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER denying as moot 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 18 Motion to Subpoena Supporting Evidence; granting 19 Motion to Strike ; denying 24 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 25 Motion to Subpoena Witness to a Li e Detector Test ; granting 26 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 30 Motion to Waive Required Copies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 2/9/2017. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
