Busack v. Belmont Savings Bank

Busack v. Belmont Savings Bank

Plaintiff:	Mark C. Busack
Defendant:	Belmont Savings Bank
Case Number:	2:2016cv00751
Filed:	August 1, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Columbus Office
County:	BELMONT
Presiding Judge:	Kimberly A. Jolson
Presiding Judge:	Michael H. Watson
Nature of Suit:	Truth in Lending
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1640
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 17, 2017	Filing 19 OPINION and ORDER overruling 16 Plaintiff's Objection; adopting 15 the Report and Recommendation; granting 4 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; denyi ng 14 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying as moot 17 Defendant's Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 3/17/17. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
September 22, 2016	Filing 15 ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 10 ); RECOMMENDS GRANTING Defendants motion to dismiss (Doc. 4 ); and RECOMMENDS DENYING Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 11 ) and motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 14 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 9/22/2016. (pes)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 17, 2017

Filing 19 OPINION and ORDER overruling 16 Plaintiff's Objection; adopting 15 the Report and Recommendation; granting 4 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; denyi ng 14 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying as moot 17 Defendant's Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 3/17/17. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

September 22, 2016

Filing 15 ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 10 ); RECOMMENDS GRANTING Defendants motion to dismiss (Doc. 4 ); and RECOMMENDS DENYING Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 11 ) and motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 14 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 9/22/2016. (pes)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Busack v. Belmont Savings Bank
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark C. Busack
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Belmont Savings Bank
Represented By:	Todd Mason Kildow
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?