Trustees of the IBEW Local No. 683 Fringe Benefit Funds, Inc. et al v. Lumbee Electrical Service, LLC
Trustees of the IBEW Local No. 683 Fringe Benefit Funds, Inc., Trustees of the Southwest LMC, Inc. and Trustees of the Joint Industry Benefit Fund |
Lumbee Electrical Service, LLC |
2:2016cv00934 |
September 28, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
FRANKLIN |
Kimberly A. Jolson |
Edmund A. Sargus |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 OPINION AND ORDER adopting 34 the Magistrate Judge's 04/7/17 Report and Recommendation. This Court grants Plaintiffs' request to the extent that it seeks to enforce the audit provision of the collective bargaining agreement, but the remainder of Plaintiffs' request is denied. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 08/09/2017. (dh1) |
Filing 34 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 33 MOTION for Default Judgment against Lumbee Electrical Service LLC. The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the Court GRANT Plaintiffs' request to the extent that it seeks to enforce the audit provision of the collective bargaining agreement but that the remainder of Plaintiffs' request be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 4/21/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 4/7/2017. (agm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.