Oden v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority et al
Willie Oden |
Ohio Adult Parole Authority, Andre Imbrogo, John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 2 and John Doe No. 3 |
2:2016cv00955 |
October 5, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
FRANKLIN |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
George C. Smith |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER adopting 2 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's objections are overruled & the complaint is dismissed. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 11/2/2016. (kk)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification [Willie Oden, 151-069 @ Chillicothe Correctional Institution, PO Box 5500, Chillicothe OH 45601]) |
Filing 2 ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Willie Oden. Plaintiff's Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is RECOMMENDED that the Court DISMISS this action for fai lure to state claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Objections to R&R due by 10/28/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 10/11/2016. (mas)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.