Payne v. Mohr et al
| Lowell N. Payne, Jr. |
| Gary Mohr, Candace Henry, Norman Robinson, John McGahee, Ingrid Jones and Leah Bobb-Itt |
| 2:2016cv00965 |
| October 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Kimberly A. Jolson |
| Edmund A. Sargus |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1985 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
OPINION AND ORDER adopting and affirming 6 the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and overruling 8 Plaintiff's Objection to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 1 is denied and this case is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 01/30/2017. (dh1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that this action be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and comply with the Court's Orders. Objections to R&R due by 12/23/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 12/6/2016. (pes)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
