Triplett-Fazzone v. United States of America et al
| Ragna Triplett-Fazzone |
| United States of America, The State of Ohio, City of Columbus Division of Police, Franklin County Sheriff's Department, City of Upper Arlington Division of Police and Gregory Ellifritz |
| 2:2016cv01016 |
| October 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Kimberly A. Jolson |
| Edmund A. Sargus |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
OPINION AND ORDER granting 42 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and DENIES the Motion for reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 3/9/2018. (mas)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
46
OPINION AND ORDER granting 9 Defendant State of Ohio's Motion to Dismiss; granting 11 Defendant City of Columbus' Motion to Dismiss; granting 17 Defendant the United States of America's Motion to Dismiss; and granting 34 Defend ant Franklin County Sheriff's Office's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 09/18/2017. (dh1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
