Dulaney v. City of Columbus, Ohio et al
| Cleophus Dulaney |
| City of Columbus, Ohio, Elizabeth C. Brown, Mitchell Brown, Shannon G. Hardin, Zachary M. Klein, Jaiza N. Page, Michael Stinziano, Priscilla R Tyson, Scott Measer, Christopher Presutti and Randall L. Hipsher |
| 2:2016cv01080 |
| November 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Terence P. Kemp |
| Michael H. Watson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER adopting and affirming 3 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 2/7/17. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER and REPORT & RECOMMENDATION re 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The following document(s) were not submitted to the Office of the Clerk: Summons and USM Forms for City of Columbus and Copies of Complaints) filed by Cleophus Dulaney in that Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is RECOMMENDED that the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims. Objections to R&R due by 2/6/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 1/23/17. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
