Jeffrey v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Jeffrey v. Commissioner of Social Security

Jeffrey v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	David L. Jeffrey
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	2:2016cv01122
Filed:	November 25, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Columbus Office
County:	GUERNSEY
Presiding Judge:	Terence P. Kemp
Presiding Judge:	Edmund A. Sargus
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 416
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 13, 2017	Filing 22 ORDER adopting the Magistrate Judge's 11/27/17 Report and Recommendation that Plaintiff's statement of error be sustained and the case be remanded to the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings. No objections have been made to the Report and Recommendation. The Court directs the Clerk to remand the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 12/13/2017. (dh1)
November 27, 2017	Filing 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 4 Complaint filed by David L. Jeffrey. It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's sole contention of error be SUSTAINED and that the Court REVERSE the Commissioner of Social Security's non-disabi lity finding and REMAND this case to the Commissioner and the ALJ under Sentence Four of § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with this Report and Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 12/11/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 11/27/2017. (kpt)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 13, 2017

Filing 22 ORDER adopting the Magistrate Judge's 11/27/17 Report and Recommendation that Plaintiff's statement of error be sustained and the case be remanded to the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings. No objections have been made to the Report and Recommendation. The Court directs the Clerk to remand the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 12/13/2017. (dh1)

November 27, 2017

Filing 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 4 Complaint filed by David L. Jeffrey. It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's sole contention of error be SUSTAINED and that the Court REVERSE the Commissioner of Social Security's non-disabi lity finding and REMAND this case to the Commissioner and the ALJ under Sentence Four of § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with this Report and Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 12/11/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 11/27/2017. (kpt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jeffrey v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: David L. Jeffrey
Represented By:	Clifford Michael Farrell
Represented By:	Jason M Mauch
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	John J. Stark
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?