Shanaberg v. Licking County et al
| Ty Shanaberg |
| Licking County, Licking County Sheriffs Office, Randy Thorp, Michael L Zwiebel, Brian Stetson, Jessica Mills, Coshocton County, Ohio, Coshocton County Sheriffs Office, Timothy L. Rogers, City of Newark, Ohio, City of Newark, Ohio, Division of Police, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3 |
| 2:2016cv01209 |
| December 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| LICKING |
| Terence P. Kemp |
| George C. Smith |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
OPINION and ORDER granting 54 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 57 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 9/11/18. (sem)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER ADOPTING and AFFIRMING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 47 in that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE against John Doe 1, 2, and 3. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 12/6/17. (sem)
|
|
Filing
47
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by Ty Shanaberg. It is RECOMMENDED that the this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE against John Doe 1, 2, and 3 pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to timely effect service of process. Objections to R&R due by 12/1/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 11/17/2017. (kpt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
