Draughon v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Draughon v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Draughon v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Petitioner:	Mickey L. Draughon
Respondent:	Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Case Number:	2:2017cv00020
Filed:	January 9, 2017
Court:	U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Columbus Office
County:	ROSS
Presiding Judge:	Elizabeth Preston Deavers
Presiding Judge:	Algenon L. Marbley
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 2, 2018	Filing 19 ORDER denying 12 Motion for Leave to Appeal; denying as moot 14 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; denying 18 Motion for Relief. DIRECTS the Clerk to VACATE this Courts June 26, 2017 Order, ECF No. 13, which was also MOOTED when the Court of Appeals vacated the May 23, 2017, Order. DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 3/2/2018. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
February 17, 2017	Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; OVERRULING Petitioner's Objection; TRANSFERRING this action to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit as a successive petition. DENYING Petitioner's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 2/17/2017. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 2, 2018

Filing 19 ORDER denying 12 Motion for Leave to Appeal; denying as moot 14 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; denying 18 Motion for Relief. DIRECTS the Clerk to VACATE this Courts June 26, 2017 Order, ECF No. 13, which was also MOOTED when the Court of Appeals vacated the May 23, 2017, Order. DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 3/2/2018. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

February 17, 2017

Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; OVERRULING Petitioner's Objection; TRANSFERRING this action to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit as a successive petition. DENYING Petitioner's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 2/17/2017. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Draughon v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Mickey L. Draughon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?