Schiff et al v. Exclusive Legal Marketing, Inc. et al
| Scott W. Schiff, Schiff & Associates Co., LPA, Kevin F. Kurgis and Kevin F. Kurgis Co., LPA |
| Exclusive Legal Marketing, Inc. and Coety Bryant |
| 2:2017cv00237 |
| March 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Kimberly A. Jolson |
| Michael H. Watson |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiffs are GRANTED $13,897.75 in attorney's fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 2/28/2018. (ew)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
43
OPINION AND ORDER granting 33 Motion for Sanctions. The Court refrains from awarding any fees and costs until Defendants have had the opportunity to file any documentation demonstrating an inability to pay. Defendant is DIRECTED to file any such d ocumentation within 7 days. The parties are DIRECTED to meet and confer and submit a status report via email by 2/27/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 2/20/2018. (ew)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
