Hairston v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Hairston v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas

Hairston v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas

Petitioner:	Rico Isaih Hairston
Respondent:	Franklin County Court of Common Pleas
Case Number:	2:2017cv00353
Filed:	April 26, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Columbus Office
County:	FRANKLIN
Presiding Judge:	Terence P. Kemp
Presiding Judge:	Edmund A. Sargus
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 12, 2017	Filing 12 OPINION AND ORDER adopting and affirming 8 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's 10 objections are OVERRULED. The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter FINAL JUDGMENT and terminate the case. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 7/11/2017. (mas)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
June 16, 2017	Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER - Petitioner's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 5 ) is GRANTED. The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DISMISSED pursuant to Rule4 of the Rules Gover ning Section 2254 cases in the United States District Courts (Rule 4). Petitioner's motion for oral argument (Doc. 7 ) is DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 6/30/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 6/16/2017. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 12, 2017

Filing 12 OPINION AND ORDER adopting and affirming 8 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's 10 objections are OVERRULED. The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter FINAL JUDGMENT and terminate the case. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 7/11/2017. (mas)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

June 16, 2017

Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER - Petitioner's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 5 ) is GRANTED. The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DISMISSED pursuant to Rule4 of the Rules Gover ning Section 2254 cases in the United States District Courts (Rule 4). Petitioner's motion for oral argument (Doc. 7 ) is DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 6/30/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 6/16/2017. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hairston v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Rico Isaih Hairston
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Franklin County Court of Common Pleas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?