Graybill v. Petta Enterprises, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Graybill v. Petta Enterprises, LLC

Graybill v. Petta Enterprises, LLC

Plaintiff:	Jesse Graybill
Defendant:	Petta Enterprises, LLC
Case Number:	2:2017cv00418
Filed:	May 16, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Columbus Office
County:	GUERNSEY
Presiding Judge:	Elizabeth Preston Deavers
Presiding Judge:	George C. Smith
Nature of Suit:	Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 201
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 15, 2018	Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING and AFFIRMING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 28 in that Plaintiff's 22 Unopposed Motion for Final Approval is GRANTED 18 and Class Counsel's Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs is GRANTED thatClass Counsel be awarded reasonable attorneys fees in the amount of $38,955, and reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $2,099.12, for a total combined amount of $41,054.12; and that Representative Plaintiff be awarded a service award in the amount of $5,500, in addition to recovery for unpaid time expended on pre-shift and post-shift work. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 10/15/18. (sem)
September 25, 2018	Filing 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that 18 Unopposed MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Jesse Graybill, and 22 Unopposed MOTION for Settlement Final Approval filed by Jesse Graybill be GRANTED. Objections to R&R due by 10/9/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on September 25, 2018. (jlk)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 15, 2018

Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING and AFFIRMING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 28 in that Plaintiff's 22 Unopposed Motion for Final Approval is GRANTED 18 and Class Counsel's Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs is GRANTED thatClass Counsel be awarded reasonable attorneys fees in the amount of $38,955, and reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $2,099.12, for a total combined amount of $41,054.12; and that Representative Plaintiff be awarded a service award in the amount of $5,500, in addition to recovery for unpaid time expended on pre-shift and post-shift work. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 10/15/18. (sem)

September 25, 2018

Filing 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that 18 Unopposed MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Jesse Graybill, and 22 Unopposed MOTION for Settlement Final Approval filed by Jesse Graybill be GRANTED. Objections to R&R due by 10/9/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on September 25, 2018. (jlk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Graybill v. Petta Enterprises, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesse Graybill
Represented By:	Matthew James Porter Coffman
Represented By:	Peter Alan Contreras
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Petta Enterprises, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?