Hairston v. Harris et al
Rico Isaih Hairston |
Allan Harris, Sarah Haines, Steven West, Miguel Santiago and Mark Hooks |
2:2017cv00421 |
May 16, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
FRANKLIN |
Terence P. Kemp |
Edmund A. Sargus |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 15 Report and Recommendation. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, Plaintiffs objection is OVERRULED, and his Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 1/5/2018. (mas)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 15 ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court GRANTS 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Rico Isaih Hairston. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff be allowed to prosecute his action without prepayment of fees or costs and that judicial officers who render services in this action shall do so as if the costs had been prepaid. Further, it is RECOMMENDED that the Court DISMISS this action in its entirety pursuant to § 1915(e)(2) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Objections to R&R due by 12/11/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 11/28/2017. (kpt)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.