McCort v. Muskingum County et al
Deano McCort |
Muskingum County, Muskingum County Sheriff's Department, Muskingum County Jail, Matt Lutz, David Soschi, Shane Love and Nicholas Travis |
2:2017cv00620 |
July 14, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
MUSKINGUM |
Kimberly A. Jolson |
George C. Smith |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 ORDER adopting and affirming the 34 Report and Recommendation in that 63 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 2/11/19. (sh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 63 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. Objections to R&R due by 1/30/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 1/16/2019. (ew)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 58 ORDER ADOPTING and AFFIRMING the 54 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION in that 51 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED as premature and 52 Plaintiff's Motion for a Stay of Judgment and the Proceedings and to Issue an Injunction Pending Appeal is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file his opposition to the pending Motion for Summary Judgment 34 no later than 30 days after the issuance of this Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 9/18/18. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 54 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and ORDER: Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS denying as premature 51 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis, RECOMMENDS denying as moot 52 for Stay of Judgment and the Proceedings and to Issue an Injunction Pending Appea l. Response to 34 Motion for Summary Judgment due within 30 days. Objections to R&R due by 8/30/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 8/16/2018. (ew)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 42 OPINION AND ORDER denying 38 Motion to Strike, granting 39 Motion for Extension of Time: Response to 34 Motion for Summary Judgment due within 21 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 5/29/2018. (ew)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 35 ORDER ADOPTING and AFFIRMING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 25 in that 15 Defendant Love's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Motion to Stay Discovery are GRANTED and Plaintiff's Discovery Motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 4/12/18. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and ORDER re 15 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Shane Love. Objections to R&R due by 2/13/2018. Additionally, Defendant Loves Motion to Stay Discovery 21 is GRANTED and Plaintiffs Discovery Motions 19 22 are DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 1/30/18. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.