Heid et al v. Hooks et al
| Ray Scott Heid and James E Damron |
| Mark Hooks and Jeffrey Howard |
| 2:2017cv00650 |
| July 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| ROSS |
| Algenon L. Marbley |
| Chelsey M. Vascura |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER granting 39 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 50 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 9/1/2020. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 19 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; adopting Report and Recommendations re 27 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiffs claims for monetary damages against Defendants in their official cap acities are DISMISSED. Plaintiffs claims for injunctive relief against Defendants in their official capacities may continue. Plaintiffs claims against Defendants in their individual capacities may continue. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 4/11/2019. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
27
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 19 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Jefrey Howard, Mark Hooks. It is RECOMMENDED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Objections to R&R due by 11/23/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 11/8/2018. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 10 Report and Recommendations, DISMISSING The Fourteenth Amendment Claim and class action allegations. Mr. Heid and Mr. Damron may proceed as to their Eighth Amendment Claim. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 7/31/2018. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
10
INITIAL SCREEN AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 9 Complaint filed by Ray Scott Heid and James E Damron. It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs' equal protection claim be DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failur e to state a claim for relief on which relief can be granted. It is further RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs' class action allegation be DISMISSED and that Plaintiffs be permitted to proceed on their Eighth Amendment claim on their own behalf only. Objections to R&R due by 9/28/2017. Response to objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 9/14/2017. (kdp)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
