Burrell v. Warden, London Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Burrell v. Warden, London Correctional Institution

Burrell v. Warden, London Correctional Institution

Petitioner:	Antonio Burrell
Respondent:	Warden, London Correctional Institution
Case Number:	2:2017cv00659
Filed:	July 28, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Columbus Office
County:	MADISON
Presiding Judge:	Algenon L. Marbley
Presiding Judge:	Chelsey M. Vascura
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 29, 2018	Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; OVERRULING Petitioner's Objection. This action is DISMISSED. The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that the appeal woul d not be in good faith and that an application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal should be DENIED. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 6/29/2018. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
April 16, 2018	Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Antonio Burrell in that it is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED. Objections to R&R due by 4/30/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 4/16/18. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 29, 2018

Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; OVERRULING Petitioner's Objection. This action is DISMISSED. The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that the appeal woul d not be in good faith and that an application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal should be DENIED. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 6/29/2018. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

April 16, 2018

Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Antonio Burrell in that it is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED. Objections to R&R due by 4/30/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 4/16/18. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burrell v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Antonio Burrell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, London Correctional Institution
Represented By:	Mary Anne Reese
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?