Sinkovitz v. Rolston et al
| Paul Sinkovitz |
| G. Drew Rolston and Jefferey Simmons |
| 2:2017cv00712 |
| August 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FAIRFIELD |
| James L. Graham |
| Chelsey M. Vascura |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER finding as moot 2 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommendations re 3 Report and Recommendations.; finding as moot 7 Motion ; denying 16 Motion to Dismiss; denying 19 Motion. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 10/19/2017. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by Paul Sinkovitz in that it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Objections to R&R d ue by 9/25/2017. Response to objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 9/11/2017. (kdp)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified text on 9/11/2017 (kdp).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
