ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Wall

ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Wall

Plaintiff:	ME2 Productions, Inc.
Defendant:	Joe Wall
Case Number:	2:2017cv00759
Filed:	August 25, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Columbus Office
County:	FRANKLIN
Presiding Judge:	Elizabeth Preston Deavers
Presiding Judge:	James L. Graham
Nature of Suit:	Copyrights
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 101
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 5, 2018	Filing 76 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 75 Report and Recommendations.. Timothy A. Shimko and plaintiff ME2 Productions, Inc., is FOUND TO BE IN CIVIL CONTEMPT. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 4/5/2018. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 8, 2018	Filing 75 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is RECOMMENDED that Timothy A. Shimko and Plaintiff ME2 Productions be found in civil contempt, and that Plaintiff be ordered to pay Defendant's reasonable expenses incurred in connection with his attendance and par ticipation in the 1/9/2018, PPTC. Defendant Wall is ORDERED to submit an affidavit setting forth his reasonable expenses, including lost wages and incidental expenses such as parking fees, incurred in connection with his attendance and participation in the 1/9/2018, PPTC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on March 8, 2018. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 5, 2018

Filing 76 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 75 Report and Recommendations.. Timothy A. Shimko and plaintiff ME2 Productions, Inc., is FOUND TO BE IN CIVIL CONTEMPT. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 4/5/2018. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

March 8, 2018

Filing 75 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is RECOMMENDED that Timothy A. Shimko and Plaintiff ME2 Productions be found in civil contempt, and that Plaintiff be ordered to pay Defendant's reasonable expenses incurred in connection with his attendance and par ticipation in the 1/9/2018, PPTC. Defendant Wall is ORDERED to submit an affidavit setting forth his reasonable expenses, including lost wages and incidental expenses such as parking fees, incurred in connection with his attendance and participation in the 1/9/2018, PPTC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on March 8, 2018. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Wall
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: ME2 Productions, Inc.
Represented By:	Timothy A Shimko
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Joe Wall
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?